SEC laws can be very complicated and hard for an individual to understand without quality legal help. These laws come into affect when an individual decides to report illegal actions at the workplace. Waste, fraud, and abuse are all valid reasons for a person to speak out. There are several rules involved under a whistleblower claim. In fact, they may wish to keep their anonymity to protect them with future career opportunities. An attorney will respect your rights to client-attorney privilege and not divulge your conversation outside of the office. A legal professional will help you fight your claim and get the respect you deserve.
Many people believe that reporting criminal activity is a good thing while others believe that it’s snitching. There are several whistleblowers that do so for the greater good of their job security and other employees. However, some people divulge company information out of malice, greed, or retaliation. If you’re doing it for the right reasons, being a whistleblower can be a great thing. You should never go along with an employer that is asking you to do unscrupulous things or give false information. In fact, if you deny to do so, you can be protected from being terminated from your job.
The SEC laws were created for individuals that chose to report fraudulent activity. It is meant to protect their job security. You don’t have to feel like you’re on your own with the help of a legal professional. They’re there to protect you against unfair practices by your boss. There are several ways that you can protect your whistleblower rights and a qualified legal professional knows how. If you’re able to identify criminal activity on your job, you can report it to the appropriate authorities and still be protected. Reporting company fraud should not cause you to be treated differently by your employer.
There are plenty of legal professionals that would like to take your whistleblower case. You should choose a SEC whistleblower attorney that will fight hard for your legal rights. Don’t try to fight your employer for retaliation on your own. Call a local whistleblower attorney in your area today.
According to Jeremy Goldstein Knockout options are the best solution for current corporation stock option woes. A knockout option is a clause that renders employee stock options null and void should their value plummet past a certain mark. By doing this the corporation is protected from overhang, burdening taxes, and ineffectual costs. Knockout options also provide incentive for employees to exercise the options, familiarize themselves with the market, and take more value in their own work.
Due to a number of disadvantages, many companies are opting out of stock options for their employees. Although offering stock is good for the company in many ways, it can also be damaging. There is the constant threat of overhang, as many employees do not do anything with their options. Many see it as a proper form of gambling and put no value in the options. Either way if the stock drops low, many employees who still hold onto their stock cause overhang, which then affects other investors. According to Jeremy Goldstein such problems can be avoided by using Knockout options to render such stock null if the value drops.
Jeremy Goldstein is a corporate lawyer with year of experience with business law. He owns his own law firm, Jeremy L. Goldstein & Associates LLC, and specializes in compensation and management matters for corporations. Goldstein has also been a part of numerous major business transactions. Over the past years he has participated in the Verizon merger with ALLTELL, Jeremy Goldstein has been a part of many historic business transactions in his time. Notable among them is the United Technologies acquisition of Goodrich, and the Verizon merger with ALLTELL, Duke Energy with Process Energy, Goldman Sachs and Kinder Morgan, as well as United Technologies acquisition of Goodrich.
Visit http://jlgassociates.com/ to learn more.
Over the recent years, companies have begun slashing stock options from employees benefit packages. Some do it strictly to save money. However, the main reasons are more complex and have convinced many to reduce or eliminate stock options.
- When the stock value drops suddenly, employees don’t have enough time to execute their options. The company is forced to record all related expenses, leaving shareholders open to the risk of “option overhang.”
- Employees do not trust this type of compensation. Employees understand that the economy dictates various stock market reactions, including options losing value. When options lose value, employees benefits are seen as casino tokens instead of cash.
- Accountants are forced to track options. When companies trade in derivatives, the costs may often outweigh any potential profits. Paid staff often would rather receive pay raises instead of stock options. Employers could afford pay raises if they eliminated options from benefits.
No matter what they say, there are some advantages to offering stock options. Some employees still prefer to receive stock options over pay raises. Some corporate executives prefer stock options because they are easy to understand how they work. Stock options means that each employee receives the same compensation. Employees’ personal earnings increase only when the share value rises. This means employees will work harder to keep the company successful.
There is one solution for companies to consider before eliminating stock options. According to Jeremy Goldstein, knockout options are the best substitute. Knockout options are very similar to stock equities, they both have the same time limits and vesting requirements. Jeremy Goldstein is recommending employers wait at least one year after the options expire before offering new replacement options. If the company doesn’t wait, they could cause the company’s quarterly statement to look negative.
Jeremy Goldstein has amassed more than 15 years of experience in business matters. Corporate executives looking for legal advice are best advised to speak with Jeremy Goldstein. Jeremy Goldstein specializes in corporate governance and executive compensation. Jeremy Goldstein has been influential in several significant financial transactions involving several companies including AT&T, Bank One, Chevron, Goldman Sachs and Verizon. Jeremy Goldstein served on the board of several organizations including the Professional Advisory Board of the NYU Journal of Law and Business, as well as Fountain House, a nonprofit organization that helps people recover from mental illness. Jeremy Goldstein continues to help corporate executives with their employee benefits. Learn more: https://www.quora.com/profile/Jeremy-Goldstein-20